Caught Between Hyper-Nationalism and Radical Purity, Diljit Dosanjh Walks a Lonely Tightrope
IN A COUNTRY that proudly calls itself the world’s largest democracy, it is tragic that a singer wearing a turban must constantly validate his patriotism.
Diljit Dosanjh, a global icon of Indian and Punjabi music, has become a lightning rod for two equally unforgiving forces: hyper-nationalists who see treachery in every cross-border interaction, and radical purists who scrutinize his every word for any sign of cultural deviation. Between these extremes stands a man who just wants to sing.
The recent controversy around Diljit’s latest film, Sardaarji 3, is a textbook case of outrage unmoored from reason.
The movie, a light-hearted Punjabi comedy featuring Pakistani actress Hania Aamir, was completed in February 2025 — two months before the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed the lives of 26 Indian soldiers. Yet, in the aftermath of that attack, calls for bans erupted.
Social media turned rabid. Film workers’ unions threatened action. “How dare he work with a Pakistani actress?” they fumed — as if an artist must carry the burden of state policy.
In a rational world, that should have been the end of it. But Diljit isn’t just an artist. He is a Sikh artist. And in today’s India, that means he must constantly walk a narrow ridge between love for his country and loyalty to his community — both of which he holds dear, and neither of which seems to trust him fully.
Diljit Dosanjh with Hania Aamir in Sardarji 3
He supported the decision to withhold the film’s release in India out of respect for public sentiment. Still, he was denounced as anti-national.
Singer Mika Singh labeled him “irresponsible” and accused him of insulting Indian emotions. Netizens went further, demanding that his passport be cancelled. Those who once danced to “Do You Know” now wanted to deport him.
“How many times must I prove that I love this country?”
But Diljit didn’t just face the wrath of jingoists. When he met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in January, a different storm erupted — this time from the other side.
Diljit Dosanjh with PM Modi
Sikh radicals accused him of selling out the farmers’ movement, of being a traitor to the cause. “Why didn’t he meet us at Singhu or Sambhu?” asked one leader angrily. No one paused to ask: Why should a singer have to answer to political camps at all?
This is the irony of being Diljit Dosanjh. He is vilified by ultra-nationalists for being too Sikh, and ridiculed by hardliners within his own community for not being Sikh enough.
When he sang about “Patiala Peg” or “whiskey” in his hits, Punjabi culture activists filed complaints and tried to have his concerts banned.
Diljit’s story exposes a culture that punishes pride in being both Sikh and Indian.
When he tweeted “Panjab” instead of “Punjab” without adding the Indian tricolor emoji, he was accused of being a Khalistani sympathizer.
Through all this, Diljit has remained remarkably poised. At international concerts like Coachella, he has waved the Indian flag with pride. He has spoken in Punjabi with pride. And still, he is forced to answer the question: “How many times must I prove that I love this country?”
It is a question that should haunt all of us. What kind of nation demands that its artists, especially those from minority communities, constantly reaffirm their allegiance through every action, every word, every collaboration? Why must the burden of loyalty fall heavier on a turbaned singer than on others?
Diljit Dosanjh Speaking During Farmers Protest
Let us not forget: Diljit Dosanjh has taken Indian culture global in a way few others have. His art has transcended borders, language, and politics.
He has brought Punjabi language and music to places where no politician ever will. And yet, he is the one made to feel like a stranger in his own land.
We are witnessing a disturbing moment in India, where even art is not allowed to be apolitical, where every creative act is a potential offense, and where every artist must walk a gauntlet of identity tests.
Diljit Dosanjh
Diljit is not just collateral damage — he is the canary in the coal mine. If someone like him — who has never shouted a slogan, never insulted the nation, never broken any law — can be branded a traitor or a sellout, then what hope is there for artistic freedom or pluralism?
In the end, Diljit’s story is not just about one film or one tweet. It is about the soul of a democracy that is fast forgetting how to trust its own people — a culture that punishes those who dare to be both proud Sikhs and proud Indians.
And it is about an artist who, despite being caught in the middle of two unyielding fronts, continues to sing.
And that, in itself, is an act of quiet courage. 
________
Also Read:
Dalai Lama at 90: Faith, Freedom, and the Geopolitics of Reincarnation
Emergency Echoes: Then and Now
Gurpartap Singh Mann
With prior experience as a Member of the Punjab Public Service Commission, the author brings a nuanced perspective to issues of governance and social change.
Disclaimer : PunjabTodayNews.com and other platforms of the Punjab Today group strive to include views and opinions from across the entire spectrum, but by no means do we agree with everything we publish. Our efforts and editorial choices consistently underscore our authors’ right to the freedom of speech. However, it should be clear to all readers that individual authors are responsible for the information, ideas or opinions in their articles, and very often, these do not reflect the views of PunjabTodayNews.com or other platforms of the group. Punjab Today does not assume any responsibility or liability for the views of authors whose work appears here.
Punjab Today believes in serious, engaging, narrative journalism at a time when mainstream media houses seem to have given up on long-form writing and news television has blurred or altogether erased the lines between news and slapstick entertainment. We at Punjab Today believe that readers such as yourself appreciate cerebral journalism, and would like you to hold us against the best international industry standards. Brickbats are welcome even more than bouquets, though an occasional pat on the back is always encouraging. Good journalism can be a lifeline in these uncertain times worldwide. You can support us in myriad ways. To begin with, by spreading word about us and forwarding this reportage. Stay engaged.
— Team PT