Internal divisions, US pressure, and an uphill struggle to challenge the dollar’s dominance
The recent BRICS Summit at Rio, apart from raising concerns on multilateral issues, was marred by dissensions within the grouping. It also faced added threats from American President Trump over BRICS’ plans to float a new global currency to compete with the US dollar — a move that would face many other hurdles before coming to fruition.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump, on Friday (July 18), mocked the BRICS bloc as a “little group” that is “fading out fast” and reiterated his warning of a 10 percent tariff on countries aligning with it, accusing them of supporting “anti-American policies.”
Trump further took credit for undermining the bloc’s attempts to challenge the global dominance of the US dollar, vowing that he would never let that happen. Taking a firm stance toward global economic competitors, Trump said: “When I heard about this group of six countries in BRICS, I hit them very hard, and if they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly.”
Though he didn’t name the nations, he added: “We can never let anyone play games with the US.” He also stressed the importance of maintaining the US dollar’s global reserve status: “We are not going to let the dollar slide… If we lost the status of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, it would be like losing a world war,” Trump said.
Trump had already targeted Brazil with new trade penalties, announcing a 50 percent tariff on imports beginning in August over what he described as “unfair” trade practices. This followed his earlier July 6 declaration of a 10 percent tariff on any nation aligning with the BRICS group.
BRICS Over the Years
The BRICS group, originally formed in 2009, is a coalition of emerging economies comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (which joined in 2010). In 2024–25, the bloc expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, bringing the total number of member countries to 11.
BRICS was established with the goal of promoting peace, development, and a more balanced global order by strengthening economic cooperation among developing nations. Over the years, it has positioned itself as a counterweight to Western-led institutions like the G7 and the IMF, advocating for a multipolar world and reforms in global governance systems. The bloc also promotes the use of local currencies in trade.
But what defines BRICS today is a subtler, more strategic ambition: to insulate itself from Washington’s gravitational pull while cooperating to build a joint high-tech industrial base. There are things that BRICS gets right. Financial global institutions such as the International Monetary Fund are in need of reform; the rich world has failed to honour climate finance promises. The group’s understandable response in the face of inaction is to create its own development bank to promote a form of green industrialisation.
Yet its size hides its contradictions. The grouping’s call for more inclusive global institutions sounds welcome, but there is a preponderance of autocracies within its own ranks. BRICS is right that international law should be upheld in Middle Eastern conflicts. But it climbs down from its moral pedestal by condemning Ukraine’s strikes on Russian infrastructure — while staying silent on Moscow’s relentless attacks on civilians.
Rio Summit and a New Global Currency
The BRICS summit in Brazil last week revealed a loose alliance of emerging powers becoming more complex — and perhaps more consequential. But the most important issue — how to replace the dollar globally — was pushed under the carpet, perhaps due to the direct threats from Trump. The de-dollarisation rhetoric, though, serves more as a signal of intent than an imminent threat to dollar hegemony.

Brics Summit 2025
A Guardian editorial on the latest BRICS summit opined: “BRICS nations can still close ranks. Their most technical yet revealing move is to start building financial ‘plumbing’ to bypass Western systems. The group is not ditching the dollar — but its members know what exclusion feels like: India had credit denied after the 2008 crash; Iranian banks have been sanctioned since 2012. The bloc’s success will depend not just on ambition, but on the capacity to coordinate across national interests.” This seems rather an uphill task, as individual interests might overcome the greater collective benefit.
Sarang Shidore, Director, Global South Program, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, Washington, D.C., in a letter to the Financial Times, opined: “The rise of BRICS provides an important multilateral corrective in a world dominated by the US for the past three decades but now transitioning away from both unipolarity and multilateralism. Such a corrective will inevitably come with its own flaws and blind spots. But a stable transition requires it.”
Dr. Diego Maiorano, a Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies (ISAS), an autonomous research institute at the National University of Singapore (NUS), commenting on the new BRICS currency, opined that the drive by BRICS+ to de-dollarise international trade remains at an embryonic stage.
Most cross-border transactions among the BRICS members are still settled in US dollars, and attempts to build alternatives (such as the BRICS Cross-Border Payment System) are nascent and far from supplanting established mechanisms like SWIFT, even though they are useful tools for countries (such as Russia and Iran) hit by sanctions.
Christopher Phillips, Professor of International Relations at Queen Mary University of London, in his article in Arab News, opined that Russia and China were among the most supportive of a new BRICS currency to challenge the dollar in Kazan.
But on the eve of the Rio de Janeiro summit, Trump’s threats contributed to reluctance among other BRICS members — especially India, which fears Chinese dominance of the new currency — to advance the proposal. No major headway was made on the issue, and the final joint statement even contained references to the global importance of the dollar — perhaps an effort by some to appease Trump.
Overall, the future of BRICS might be shaped less by external threats and more by its ability to reconcile internal contradictions and articulate a coherent vision for global governance. For now, the coalition is more a reflection of the shifting geopolitics of the Global South than a monolithic challenger to the West.
The embryonic nature of its de-dollarisation efforts and the moderating influence of India and Brazil suggest that the group’s challenge is more latent than explicit. Nevertheless, as Western institutions continue to grapple with questions of legitimacy and representativeness, the mere existence of BRICS — with all its contradictions — signals a world in flux, and an invitation to rethink the foundations of international order.
________
Also Read:
Courts in Crisis, Solutions in Sight: The Case for Urgent Reform
Disclaimer : PunjabTodayNews.com and other platforms of the Punjab Today group strive to include views and opinions from across the entire spectrum, but by no means do we agree with everything we publish. Our efforts and editorial choices consistently underscore our authors’ right to the freedom of speech. However, it should be clear to all readers that individual authors are responsible for the information, ideas or opinions in their articles, and very often, these do not reflect the views of PunjabTodayNews.com or other platforms of the group. Punjab Today does not assume any responsibility or liability for the views of authors whose work appears here.
Punjab Today believes in serious, engaging, narrative journalism at a time when mainstream media houses seem to have given up on long-form writing and news television has blurred or altogether erased the lines between news and slapstick entertainment. We at Punjab Today believe that readers such as yourself appreciate cerebral journalism, and would like you to hold us against the best international industry standards. Brickbats are welcome even more than bouquets, though an occasional pat on the back is always encouraging. Good journalism can be a lifeline in these uncertain times worldwide. You can support us in myriad ways. To begin with, by spreading word about us and forwarding this reportage. Stay engaged.
— Team PT